Should 'Abstinence-Only' Sex-Ed be Taught in Public Schools?

Should 'Abstinence-Only' Sex-Ed be Taught in Public Schools?

What should public schools teach our children about sex? It can be a complex question, especially when dealing with morals, social norms, pop culture, hormones and health. When students sit down for their sex education, should teachers embrace an abstinence-only policy?

Next question in Health

Dietwatch_med_rectangle_orange

  • “Yes”
  • “Objection”
Expedia_last_minute_travel_wide_sky
APHA

But Teaching Abstinence and Contraception Works Even Better

American Public Health Association

Although not necessarily their objective, the argument above provides compelling evidence for why a comprehensive sexual education curriculum is best.

The authors cite a CDC study that concluded that “both abstinence and contraception contributed to the decline in teen pregnancy rates between 1991 and 2001,” with 53 percent of the decline in teen pregnancy rates attributed to abstinence and 47 percent to contraceptive use.

If both contraceptive use and abstinence are responsible for a decline in teen pregnancy rates, then what rationale would there be for teaching abstinence exclusively? Clearly comprehensive sex education is the best tool for keeping our kids healthy.

Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

Abstinence Only Sex-Ed?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.