Should 'Abstinence-Only' Sex-Ed be Taught in Public Schools?

Should 'Abstinence-Only' Sex-Ed be Taught in Public Schools?

What should public schools teach our children about sex? It can be a complex question, especially when dealing with morals, social norms, pop culture, hormones and health. When students sit down for their sex education, should teachers embrace an abstinence-only policy?

Next question in Health

Dietwatch_med_rectangle_orange
This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


You are seeing 2 Comments on this Argument. See all 52 Comments on this Question.
Regarding Argument
Comprehensive Sex Ed is Best Tool to Achieve Goals
- From APHA
No Side
By American Public Health Association - Protect, Prevent, Live Well

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • msreason
    Teach That Abstinence is the Best Method of Birth Control

    Knowledge is vital. Children from a very young age must learn about procreation and the vehicle by which that is made possible. Gradual training in the home is the best method, but we puritanistic Americans are often embarrased to take on that responsibility, therefore it falls upon the shoulders of our schools. Its best for kids to learn the FACTS and not learn the distorted information shared amongst fellow youth. Children should be taught that abstinence is the best form of birth control. But, realistically, they need to know about STD transmission and the terrible damage they can do to the body for life. Kids also need to know how to properly use all forms of birth control. This kind of education won't encourage children to have more sex as we can see from this kind of education in many European countries.

    - msreason September 9, 2008 8:32PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Regarding Objection
Conflicting Messages
- From Lifeway
Yes Side
By LifeWay Christian Resources - Biblical solutions for life

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Michael Glass
    Concurring Messages

    Proper information about the risks of sexually transmitted disease and unwanted pregnancy, and the relative success and failure rates of condoms and other barrier methods of contraception do not undercut the argument for sexual abstinence. On the contrary, they reinforce the message that casual sex carries serious risks. As a result, children given comprehensive sex education are slower to become sexually active, and tend to be more careful when they do have sexual intercourse.

    From an abstinence point of view, taking precautions is not ideal. However, from a public health point of view, it's a significant improvement.


    - Michael GlassAU November 15, 2008 3:53AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Abstinence Only Sex-Ed?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • Lifeway
    LifeWay, an entity of the Southern Baptist Convention, is one of the world’s largest providers of Christian products and... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.